|
Tech Specs
|
The world's first 64bit console
was also
the first true 'next generation' machine - Commodore's 32bit
CD32 was based on old Amiga technology. Despite beating Nintendo, Sega and Sony to the Next Gen punch, the lack of decent software and doubts about the viability of cartridge based software and the ability of Atari to attract high profile developers to work on the machine led to apathy in the marketplace. The Jaguar was originally
developed with
a 32bit console called Panther, but Atari decided early that their
Atari attempted to regain it's
prominence
in the videogame market by releasing the Jaguar. The specs
|
|
to The Below Address Player's Choice (336) 712-0062
|
Marty
Blessinger bigissues@yahoo.com
on Thursday, September 20, 2001 at 01:00:19
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- I can't believe the 64-bit debate is going on--especially claiming the Jaguar is 16-bit based on the 68000CPU!!! That would be as ridiculous as rating your car's horsepower based on its starter motor. Atari used the 68000 simply because you don't need anything more powerful than that to do the menial tasks like checking the joystick ports. That some lazy developers ported games over to the Jag which ran almost exclusively on the Motorola is not Atari's fault and does not mean that as a system, and where it counts, the Jaguar isn't "64-bits." If anyone is interested, the URL for the excellent Jag FAQ is: http://www.digiserve.com/eescape/atari/FAQ_-_Jaguar The section
entitled "Was
the Jaguar really a 64-bit system?" explains everything really well.
|
Generic_Superhero
shboom87@hotmail.com
on Saturday, August 11, 2001 at 13:32:04
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Atari Jaguar makes the N64 and the PlayStation look so bad I cant find a word for it. It puts all other consoles to shame(except todays odern 128 bit consoles like the SEGA Dreamcast). The PlayStation and N64 just cant compeat with the Atari Jaguar. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
Assasin Assasin_nation@yahoo.com
on Sunday, July 22, 2001 at 17:51:43
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- u all r dumb man did u know that the jag had a gpu that was called tom and jerry and it had 2 processors in it infact they were both 16bit each that makes 32bit u can still call atari and ask people itz not that hard a private person own`s this now i know cauz i own one and i had called em i looked up there site as well but there games are expancive very expancive i mean about $42.00 each if u e-mail me i can get u there number and web site if u like the system was caled to be 64bit cauz the map texturing trust me i know i opened mines up and took a look lol man the thing is old but old is gold i still play it and love it i think about this like the rest of game systems ..... --------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
Werner Domroese werner5@hotmail.com
on Sunday, July 8, 2001 at 15:25:54
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- One of you guys said the main CPU was 16-bit. I thereby assume that you are talking about the Motorola MC68000. Sure, in most systems this is the main processors, but in the Jaguar, it is only used for general purpose tasks, such as taking care of controller input. The Jaguar was
built around
three chips housing a total of five processors (look up the FAQ).
One
Jerry was the DSP and represented its audio subsystem. The problem is,
programmers
have a choice which processors to use. While they normally should
The Jaguars
bottlenecks were
a) poor marketing (especially in Europe) and b) tough system to
Anyway, to get
back to the
n-bit issues, the memory bus was 64-bits (that is, memory got
accessed
The issue is not
wether or
not a system is technically n-bits or runs at n Megahertz but more how
a
If you call the
Jag a 16-bit
system because it has a 68000 inside (whithout ever mentioning how
or
The Jaguar,
overall, can
be considered truly 64-bits because all system components that have
the
The fact is,
Atari left it
up to the programmers which chips to use and therefore, what kind of
games
BTW - The Virtual
Light Machine
feature of the Jaguars CD-ROM add-on is now available in NUON-
|
Stacy benaiah@alltel.net
on Monday, June 18, 2001 at 17:50:02
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- Even though this system did come with a 64 bit processor, the graphics output that you receive is going to be along the lines of what you'd see on a 24-bit machine. A little about a Super Nintendo, but not as good as a PlayStation. So, in reality, we have the world's only 24-bit video game system. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
Madness () on
Thursday,
June 7, 2001 at 22:54:33
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- This was one of the worst systems ever made.A Crappy library of games bad play controll and it was really 32 bit from what i heard.If it really was 32 bit and they said it was 64 bit they should have gotten in trouble with the law or something for those lies.another thing about this system the power button seems like it could wear out real fast.One of the games for it called Kasumi Ninja a cheap knock off of Mortal Kombat has almost as bad of play controll as Karate Champ For NES.Do not buy this system............ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
Ciaran
McCrisken ciaranmccrisken@ukgateway.neton
Tuesday, June 5, 2001 at 13:05:02
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yes, it did have two 32bit processors but that doesn't mean it's 64bit! It means it is an extremely powerful 32bit system. You need a 64bit based chipset to make a console 64bit, two 32bit chips w on't count cos the machine doesn't understand (and can't cope) with 64bit. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
dave dswan@igl.co.uk
on Thursday, May 31, 2001 at 06:21:20
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Jag did have 2 32 bit processors called tom and jerry, it had a 6800 to help them out and it had a 64 bit bus, It never had a 64 bit chip, but the 2 32 bit chips communicated to each other via the 64 bit bus, so it was kind of 64 bit, well it was were it needed to be. It also had a thing called a blitter, Havn't a clue what that is but all the programmers I knew got V excited when you mentioned it so it must have been good. I work in a video games producing company and we had communication with Atari at the time and it was obvious they didn't have the slightest clue, They were REALLY REALLY DUMB, so endeth the tail. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
Mike
brolin mrpersonality@webtv.net
on Thursday, May 10, 2001 at 08:09:47
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- Even calling it 32 bit is a joke its 24 bit cartridge system with low memory complex and dumb chips and thats why it died faster than fred sanford at a casino -------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
Michael mwoodj2@yahoo.com
on Sunday, January 28, 2001 at 16:19:15
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- The system uses 64 bit hardware and so it is a 64 bit system. I own one and wouldn't trade it for anything. For it's time the system was amazing. It would have been real awesome if only Atari had marketed it better. But, don't believe people when they say there are little games for it. They have hardware now that allows you to hook the system into your computer and play games downloaded off the net. Because of this many freeware independent releases can be found on the internet. And I'm not talking little crappy ping pong games and such. There are some pretty killer games out there. The system is awesome and anyone who says otherwise hasn't played one. Also, if anyone can find a decently priced Towers II for the system or has one to sale please e-mail me. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
Mitchell importunar16@esweeet.com
on Monday, January 15, 2001 at 13:52:09
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hey can you please tell atari to e-mail me cause they really need to make another system. I miss atari!!!!!!!!!!! maybe they could make an atari 10400. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
Chris
(annuvin03@sega.net)
on Sunday, January 7, 2001 at 13:05:41
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- The jaguar is truly a 64 bit system. The system itself was powered by ONE 64 bit Nec RISC processor and the sound engine was powered by a Motorola MC68000P8 processor, which is an 8 bit, 8 Mhz chip. If you do not believe me, go to their website at http://www.motorola.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
John
ccsjab@aol.com
on Wednesday, November 29, 2000 at 21:42:34
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- I would like to inform everyone that the Jag has two custom 32-bit microprocessors. Now this does not make it a TRUE 64-bit machine. While the concept of 32+32=64 in the computer world it is considered a 64-bit computer (or dual processor). Now the bus is only 16-bits wide, which is to accommodate the 32-bit processor. Think of a business system (a la Proliant 3000) with 2 Pentiums in it. It runs on the same bus, the cores of each processor are independent of the other but can co-process. The Jag may have 2 main CPU's but share the same L1 cache, this only means speed! Now the Jag is a 32-bit monster on steroids and if it had the software it would have blown the playstation outta the water, that’s a fact I can truly contest! Cool site, wish there were more like it! --------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
Shaun Charger528@yahoo.com
on Tuesday, October 24, 2000 at 13:27:42
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- Then I gues the SNES is a 16 bit system since it ha 2 8 bit processors. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
Barry L. Laws,
Jr. bigdcaldavis2000@yahoo.com
on Wednesday, October 11, 2000 at 17:26:12
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- I bought my Jaguar in late 1994, and I still have it. I only have around 9 games for it...some good, some bad (Kasumi Ninja is worse than bad). My games include Alien Vs Predator (excellent... sometimes the facehuggers make me jump), Cybermorph (underrated game...actually good), Kasumi Ninja, Trevor McFur In Crescent Galaxy (another stinker gameplay-wise), Val d'Isere Skiing & Snowboarding (good but too similar to the Tommy Moe SNES game), Iron Soldier (excellent game), Brutal Sports Football (an okay game...could've been better), Doom (very good on Jag, but the N64 and PSX versions are better [PSX had more levels and in-game music, and N64 had both of those but much better graphics]), and Tempest 2000 (very good game [my 2nd fave...#1 being AvP]...love that techno music). I never did buy the Jag CD-rom add-on because Atari was in free-fall at that time, but I might get one later on (especially for Iron Soldier 2, even though there is a cart version of that as well). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
James j.s.weston@worldnet.att.net
on Wednesday, August 9, 2000 at 09:16:54
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- I remember having one before and would'nt mind getting it again. Only problem is there was only one great game for it that still outdoes the playstation and thats Alien Vs. Predator. When you get one then I'll buy one or should I say both --------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
Adam Pratt
atariwizz@yahoo.com
on Wednesday, July 12, 2000 at 08:03:58
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- To correct Andy, it actually has two 64-bit processors, and only one 16-bit processor (motorola 68000). Also, it's had several new games come out for it over the past several months, some of the best the system has had. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
Steven
Messinger CharlesM1@prodigy.net
on Friday, July 7, 2000 at 15:19:03
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- But It would be a joke calling this system 64-bit. It looks like the 32x. The main cpu powering the system was 16 bit so there you go. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
Anthony
Hanrahan ECWN64@aol.com
on Wednesday, April 26, 2000 at 17:42:38
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Jaguar is NOT a 64-bit system. It is only 32-bit. It is powered by TWO 32-bit processors, but that does not make it 64-bit system. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
Andy Borne
arkanaraju@hotmail.com
on Friday, January 14, 2000 at 00:32:26
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Atari Jaguar is a 64 bit system (it has one 64 bit processor, two 32 bit processors, and two 16 bit processors). You guys have it listed as a 32 bit on your main page. I just thought you should correct that, or change the wording you use on the category to something more along the line of "recent systems," or something else to that effect. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
Do
you have any information or facts about this videogame system?
If
you do, we would love to here from you.
Submit
it on Our Atari
Jaguar Forum